Dragon Ball Z Ultimate Tenkaichi

This definitely looks like another Spike production. Bah...

What's the current rerelease completely original Tenkaichi-style game tally?

barf

I don't even remember the last time I played a 3D DBZ game.

Neo wrote:

What's the current rerelease completely original Tenkaichi-style game tally?

Sparking
Sparking NEO
Sparking Meteor
Raging Blast
Raging Blast 2
DBZ Tag Vs
This game now, I guess

So seven.

If it was Raging Blast 3 they'd just say. They're going to announce that it's BT4.

Savage∞ wrote:

Neo wrote:

What's the current rerelease completely original Tenkaichi-style game tally?

Sparking
Sparking NEO
Sparking Meteor
Raging Blast
Raging Blast 2
DBZ Tag Vs
This game now, I guess

So seven.

weaboo

Also this looks like something better then rqaging blast but i never played that game because it looked shit.

Using English titles makes me a what now?

Savage∞ wrote:

Using English titles makes me a what now?

The english title was not sparking. You're using the japanese and korean title. Good game though.

Quote :

The english title was not sparking.

The original title is an English word turned into an adjective.
The molested title is backwards and needlessly Wapanese.

Being "weeaboo" is siding with anything Japanese just because it's Japanese.

Savage∞ wrote:

Quote :

The english title was not sparking.

The original title is an English word turned into an adjective.
The molested title is backwards and needlessly Wapanese.

Being "weeaboo" is siding with anything Japanese just because it's Japanese.

So choosing to use the japanese name when everyone else in the topic is referring to the english title, you know the actual english title as opposed to the butchered english title of the japanese version of the game. Isn't douchey or wapanese at all?

Your logic is flawed and makes no sense unless you actually you actually are a weeaboo.

Okay.

No, but seriously, I'm supposed to change my nomenclature around because it doesn't align with other peoples'? Other people that know what I'm talking about? Hell no.

Savage∞ wrote:

No, but seriously, I'm supposed to change my nomenclature around because it doesn't align with other peoples'? Other people that know what I'm talking about? Hell no.

No your not supposed to, but at least just give a better reason then the english title is butchered despite when the japanese version has a butchered title. Face it both names are flawed. At least the english title was trying to refer to something in DBZ. I also don't know japanese well enough to know if both ways round those words make a valid title or not.

I don't think i've ever seen you refer to pokemon as pocket monsters and whatever other things you talk about by their japanese titles.

The original title referred to something in DBZ too, the "Sparking" that's heard at the end of every Head Cha-La. It's a general term they use in the DB franchise to describe someone who's brimming with power. If both titles are flawed, I see no problems with using the actual name over the adopted name, the latter of which was blatantly just an attempt to cash in on the Budokai titles (they even use the same typeset for that reason).

And Pokemon are called Pokemon in both English and Japanese. "Pocket Monsters" is the source of the word, but it's not what anyone's expected to say, just like "Pocket (Monsters) Ball" being the source of Pokeball and "Pocket (Monsters) Index" being the source words of Pokedex.

Savage∞ wrote:

The original title referred to something in DBZ too, the "Sparking" that's heard at the end of every Head Cha-La. It's a general term they use in the DB franchise to describe someone who's brimming with power. If both titles are flawed, I see no problems with using the actual name over the adopted name, the latter of which was blatantly just an attempt to cash in on the Budokai titles (they even use the same typeset for that reason).

And Pokemon are called Pokemon in both English and Japanese. "Pocket Monsters" is the source of the word, but it's not what anyone's expected to say, just like "Pocket (Monsters) Ball" being the source of Pokeball and "Pocket (Monsters) Index" being the source words of Pokedex.

You mean people promote products in a way to get the most money i'm shocked, I honestly thought they just wanted to tell the truth and work for the good of the people. Honestly though never listened to Head cha-la all the way through.

The original game was called pocket monsters aka.

They call them "Pokemon" in Japanese too. Always have.

Spoiler:

...At least the graphics look somewhat decent.

Savage∞ wrote:

They call them "Pokemon" in Japanese too. Always have.

Spoiler:

I'm gonna say i'm not trying to make you look like a dick but your starting to act like one again (seriously circling a thing from this year is redundant to prove always have) so i'll just have to play along and i hope your done with embarassing yourself? I hate when actual fans of a franchise know fuck all. I don't even like pokemon and i knew it was originally called pocket monsters seeing as the game had all ready been in japanese stores for a couple of years by the time it reached you.

Spoiler:

Forget it.

This game is gonna suuuuuuuck and I'm gonna troll the fuck out of the boards for it while it's still not released.

In Savage's defense, there is a clear difference between the Sparking and the BT games, namely that the music pretty much destroys any sort of Dragon Ball atmosphere in the latter.

Kaio wrote:

In Savage's defense, there is a clear difference between the Sparking and the BT games, namely that the music pretty much destroys any sort of Dragon Ball atmosphere in the latter.

I wonder if Yamamoto would be pissed if he knew how much people constantly credit him for the new mediocre music in the BT/RB series despite the fact he never composed anything for them.

Somehow I think he'd eagerly accept being credited with anything he didn't compose.

The graphics are real purdy at least.

I don't see any real difference between this game's graphics and Raging Blast's shit.