Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3

What you essentially just described is already covered by Amaterasu and Arthur.

Skip wrote:

They could add him in so people can just beat the shit out of him to great satisfaction.

Better yet, he only has a model in training mode as the enemy. He does no moves other than a basic jab for counters.

Baal wrote:

What you essentially just described is already covered by Amaterasu and Arthur.

They aren't Megaman. And I want any megaman Original, X, Volnutt or otherwise to play the way Volnutt did in TvC. Not the way Megaman played in MvC.

He needs to have an onslaught power up though... be homage to MvC1 >_>

Quote :

They aren't Megaman

Oh okay, that's good enough reason to add him in when two characters already fill his spot and everything he does we- WAIT A MINUTE.

Yeah I give up on that front. I'm not going to be around aside from today so I'll just say one last thing.

What I'm most upset about, now that Nemesis is revealed. Is that we have RE5 Jill.

I want to recreate RE3 damnit.

That's dumb.

More like trying to enjoy past experiances in a game that shares those 2 characters.

If I wanted to talk to trolls I would have went to gamefaqs Baal. Like shit man be human for me.

Quote :

More like trying to enjoy past experiances in a game that shares those 2 characters.

Jill is in the video game. Nothing is stopping you from doing this other than you wanting to be some stupid purist and needing Jill's RE3 look to do so.

It would have been a lot cooler that way. Why bother adding nemesis then? A tyrant would have been more fitting with Wesker, and Chris. Fuck Zero Jill Samus.

I think I've just about ran out of things to complain about. I'm more happy than dissapointed really. These are all just little things.

Ace wrote:

Why bother adding nemesis then? A tyrant would have been more fitting with Wesker, and Chris.

Are you fucking serious? Because he's a great addition to the game with being a well known RE villain, a powerhouse for Capcom in the same vein as Sentinel is for Marvel, he fits in with the Marvel series well and he's a huge fucking monster. They didn't a Tyrant in because that's a generic type of monster you see in several RE games, they added in Nemesis because he is a defining RE villain with his rocket launcher, unstoppable force, and the way he looks. He doesn't even look like a generic Tyrant so he has a unique look when compared others.

You seriously don't seem to understand why they would add any of these characters beyond "Oh well, I want to reenact my favorite series with this character and it's only fitting if this character is in the game with this other character" and that's one of the worst ways to think when making choices on roster selection. The Jill comment is your opinion but it's still a poor excuse to get mad at a video game developer because they decided to go with the most recent look for a character than one that was theirs nearly a decade ago.

Quote :

These are all just little things.

Obviously not, since you just stood around and had a 2 Page argument with your poor excuses for why Capcom didn't do this and that.

Ace wrote:

It would have been a lot cooler that way. Why bother adding nemesis then? A tyrant would have been more fitting with Wesker, and Chris. Fuck Zero Jill Samus.

I think I've just about ran out of things to complain about. I'm more happy than dissapointed really. These are all just little things.

Nemesis is probably the best single boss zombie type thing in the series. He also had multiple forms used weapon and had a decent amount of intelligence.

Tyrant being in would be bollocks might as well have a ghost from ghost and goblins.

Baal wrote:

Ace wrote:

Why bother adding nemesis then? A tyrant would have been more fitting with Wesker, and Chris.

Are you fucking serious? Because he's a great addition to the game with being a well known RE villain, a powerhouse for Capcom in the same vein as Sentinel is for Marvel, he fits in with the Marvel series well and he's a huge fucking monster. They didn't a Tyrant in because that's a generic type of monster you see in several RE games, they added in Nemesis because he is a defining RE villain with his rocket launcher, unstoppable force, and the way he looks. He doesn't even look like a generic Tyrant so he has a unique look when compared others.

Remember my original post when I was happy for capcom villians and Nemesis? I like Nemesis just pissed that I can't relive RE3 in one of my favorite fighting games

Baal wrote:

You seriously don't seem to understand why they would add any of these characters beyond "Oh well, I want to reenact my favorite series with this character and it's only fitting if this character is in the game with this other character" and that's one of the worst ways to think when making choices on roster selection. The Jill comment is your opinion but it's still a poor excuse to get mad at a video game developer because they decided to go with the most recent look for a character than one that was theirs nearly a decade ago.

I understand. They add them for fan demand. And I'm a fan demanding certain things. Well maybe not demanding but I expect things and I'm dissapointed with thier choices like any other fan. It's unavoidable. I just wanted to voice my concerns like a good nerd.

Baal wrote:

Quote :

These are all just little things.

Obviously not, since you just stood around and had a 2 Page argument with your poor excuses for why Capcom didn't do this and that.

I'm still going to buy the game nomatter what. Thats what I mean by them being little things. If I had such a big problem I wouldn't be planning to buy the game at all.

Ace wrote:

Baal wrote:

You seriously don't seem to understand why they would add any of these characters beyond "Oh well, I want to reenact my favorite series with this character and it's only fitting if this character is in the game with this other character" and that's one of the worst ways to think when making choices on roster selection. The Jill comment is your opinion but it's still a poor excuse to get mad at a video game developer because they decided to go with the most recent look for a character than one that was theirs nearly a decade ago.

I understand. They add them for fan demand. And I'm a fan demanding certain things. Well maybe not demanding but I expect things and I'm dissapointed with thier choices like any other fan. It's unavoidable. I just wanted to voice my concerns like a good nerd.

And Baal just wants everyone to know that the game is not tailored to their specific wants and that you should just be happy with what you get without bitching about what you missed out on. IS THAT SO WRONG ACE.

Thank you Skip for posting something so I don't have to type up another paragraph on trying to explain logic.

Theres nothing wrong with that. I am satisfied... kinda.

Would be cool if one of the DLC characters turns out to be a Power Stone character.

Updated the OP to include the history of MvC, new features and other details.

I'm missing a paragraph about Gambit's greatness, mon ami.

Kaio wrote:

I'm missing a paragraph about Gambit's greatness, mon ami.

oh u

Michael Sinterniklaas as Phoenix Wright? That's not a bad choice considering they didn't get the guy who does all his Ace Attorney shouts (which would have been awesome).

Michael Sinterniklaas is always that guy I heard Wright's voice in whenever I played the AA games, so I'm really excited about that.

He's one of the few 4kids actors that I like. He was a great match for Leonardo.

Mike Sinterniklaas did work for 4Kids a few times but he's also done a lot of work for other companies too. I think he's Dean Venture in the Venture Brothers.

He's even been with FUNi, I know. He is Dean but I think his most famous role would be Leo from TMNT. He was also a good Horohoro "Trey" in Shaman King and Dark Magician.

So do the rumors that there may be 8 more DLC characters after this have any substance to them?