Went to see Thor last night

It doesn't matter who plays Hulk, because The Avengers will be the best superhero movie of all time regardless.

Kaio wrote:

It doesn't matter who plays Hulk, because The Avengers will be the best superhero movie of all time regardless.

And if it isn't?

Whatever happened to the Antman movie? I heard Simon Pegg was going to play him.

YOU DON'T KNOW MY PAIN wrote:

Kaio wrote:

It doesn't matter who plays Hulk, because The Avengers will be the best superhero movie of all time regardless.

And if it isn't?

Then it would still be the second best supermovie of all time.

A_Nonny_Moose wrote:

Whatever happened to the Antman movie? I heard Simon Pegg was going to play him.

Not quite sure it just seemed to disappear. Ant man was supposed to be in avengers but i've not heard any mention of him.

If Simon Pegg played him though that would be awesome.

If an Ant-Man movie does happen, it'll be loooong after Avengers. And hopefully minus Simon Pegg.

The only heroes in Avengers are Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Black Widow and Hawkeye. Hulk is in it, but it's unknown on what side he'll be on.

Avengers 2 will probably add Wasp and Pym.

Anyone else think Hawkeye's cameo in Thor was a let down? We didn't seen anything of what he's capable of.

It was bittersweet. He appeared as the main man Jeremy Renner, and was written like Clint Barton is supposed to be written... but nothing fucking happened. I was waiting for him to shoot something, ANYTHING, but he didn't. I mean, there's only so much he could've done without killing Thor, but maybe add something from Green Arrow's bag of tricks and have him shoot a flash grenade? I dunno. It didn't help that this all took place during a terrible fighting sequence either.

Jeremy renner the guy in swat why is he the main man?

Because he's great. I didn't see him in any swat movie, I mostly associate him with The Hurt Locker and The Town.

Savage∞ wrote:

Because he's great. I didn't see him in any swat movie, I mostly associate him with The Hurt Locker and The Town.

Not a swat movie:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0257076/

I haven't seen it in any case.

The Hurt Locker was annoying.

Maybe so, but Jeremy Renner in The Hurt Locker wasn't.

Savage∞ wrote:

Maybe so, but Jeremy Renner in The Hurt Locker wasn't.

Is he your latest crush?

Maybe.

Your probably just at that age where your not sure if your gay or not. Your at around the age people come out.

I went and seen Thor last night, fucking awesome. It was my first time seeing a movie in 3d in theaters and I was expecting more from it I guess. I mean my dad has new high depth LED LCD 60' tv at our new cottage and it looked just like that does.

But still all in all it was money well spent.

Seeing Thor in 3D adds little next to nothing to the experience, as with most movies.

Savage∞ wrote:

Seeing Thor in 3D adds little next to nothing to the experience, as with most movies.

Did you watch this on your small computer monitor?

I watched superman in 3d and i can definitely say it made a crap film pretty good. The spaceship sequence was insane.

Superman was shit no matter how you saw it.

Quote :

Did you watch this on your small computer monitor?

No, I watched it in the theater after I watched it normally. And it was a waste of money. Not everything needs to be pimped out like that.

3D is a stupid gimmick that needs to die. Why would anyone want to pay extra to see some small effects an intern added during post-production.

I saw it in 3D, although I didn't know it was a 3D showing until I got given some glasses as I was going in. Like every other 3D film I've seen, it's an impressive efect that you forget about after 5 minutes. After a while you don't even realise it's 3D anymore. Which makes me think it's a waste of time, but I prefer that over constantly trying to draw attention to the 3D.