Record of Agarest: Generations of War

I'm waiting for Trine to show up on PSN+, which I'm hoping will be soon just before the sequel comes out. Outland is great. Haven' played it since I beat it though, and never tried co-op.

i'm dl 'ing this again while i wait for RE chronicles. maybe i can get into it. too bad my DL speed is god awful today

i already set it to autoplay........

i should have known better than to re download this

Cuddles With Claire wrote:

i should have known better than to re download this

Hmm why?

If you want a detailed list of why this game is terrible i can give you one.

Blackchaosdragon wrote:

Cuddles With Claire wrote:

i should have known better than to re download this

Hmm why?

for starters the detail in the battlefield is horrible, especially since it's a movement grid similar to other srpg's. the horrible part being heavily due to the fact that all battlefields have exactly the same layout grid unless you like changing starting battle formation which is a stupid idea.

it doesn't help that the story pacing isn't that great because you'll have to fight 5-20 battles to reach the next major and like i said before the battlefield doesn't change unless you choose to.

i'm normally not a graphics whore but aside from the cutscenes everything looks like a ps1 game and the battle animations aren't exciting at all. i turned all battle animations off already. HDN has far superior graphics and i don't think it's that great at all. it's only slightly worse than cross edge but i'm more forgiving on that because battle animations are much nicer in CE.

the only thing i really liked is how much planning it takes to pull devastating combos but the fact that all battlefields are the same really put me off and i it becomes very monotonous unless i get ambushed. if that happens your weakest members are basically fucked cause they can be easily killed in one turn. the only actual difference in battlefields are when different monsters appear in a slightly different formation

Cuddles With Claire wrote:

HDN has far superior graphics

I agree, the graphics in that are much better.

Spoiler:

Superbuu3 wrote:

If you want a detailed list of why this game is terrible i can give you one.

Thanks but i'll pass you'll tear into my soul if you do

Cuddle Party wrote:

Blackchaosdragon wrote:

Cuddles With Claire wrote:

i should have known better than to re download this

Hmm why?

for starters the detail in the battlefield is horrible, especially since it's a movement grid similar to other srpg's. the horrible part being heavily due to the fact that all battlefields have exactly the same layout grid unless you like changing starting battle formation which is a stupid idea.

it doesn't help that the story pacing isn't that great because you'll have to fight 5-20 battles to reach the next major and like i said before the battlefield doesn't change unless you choose to.

i'm normally not a graphics whore but aside from the cutscenes everything looks like a ps1 game and the battle animations aren't exciting at all. i turned all battle animations off already. HDN has far superior graphics and i don't think it's that great at all. it's only slightly worse than cross edge but i'm more forgiving on that because battle animations are much nicer in CE.

Hey cross edge was Awesomesause it just lacked an etna factor is all.
Allthough i hated that bast*** Vermillion.... uber boss ... jeez.

Cuddle Party wrote:

the only thing i really liked is how much planning it takes to pull devastating combos but the fact that all battlefields are the same really put me off and i it becomes very monotonous unless i get ambushed. if that happens your weakest members are basically fucked cause they can be easily killed in one turn. the only actual difference in battlefields are when different monsters appear in a slightly different formation

Oh i see .... that aside your name changes faster than neptune break.

Inigo Montoya wrote:

Cuddles With Claire wrote:

HDN has far superior graphics

I agree, the graphics in that are much better.

Spoiler:

AAAAAAGGGGHH I SEE A XBOX, oh wait its fine.

i found cross edge enjoyable for a while, this is just bad

Cuddle Party wrote:

i found cross edge enjoyable for a while, this is just bad

Indeed every game with etna is very enjoyable lol
Aregerest.... i wonder why is still doing well despite it being bad ....

because it's a low budget game

I don't even play my PSP anymore. But if I did... I'd probably be back to switching between Dissidia & Fate Unlimited Codes while telling myself I'll one day DL Maverick Hunter X. lol

Blackchaosdragon wrote:

Cuddle Party wrote:

i found cross edge enjoyable for a while, this is just bad

Indeed every game with etna is very enjoyable lol
Aregerest.... i wonder why is still doing well despite it being bad ....

It was DD only in the US so its false advertising of being basically a eroge game would've made a bunch of ppl buy it for a high price and then they can't trade it in.

Its low budget and its later games added in move controls to emulate massaging girls, its just using sex to sell and it apparently worked number 2 which is the third in the series seems to actually have decent graphics.

Superbuu3 wrote:

Blackchaosdragon wrote:

Cuddle Party wrote:

i found cross edge enjoyable for a while, this is just bad

Indeed every game with etna is very enjoyable lol
Aregerest.... i wonder why is still doing well despite it being bad ....

It was DD only in the US so its false advertising of being basically a eroge game would've made a bunch of ppl buy it for a high price and then they can't trade it in.

Its low budget and its later games added in move controls to emulate massaging girls, its just using sex to sell and it apparently worked number 2 which is the third in the series seems to actually have decent graphics.

False advertising and sex.... heck....
but people must have realised that from playing the first if they intend to buy the second
that it will be equally similar ... somwhat