Batman: Arkham City

conflict is the spice of life.

Zero wrote:

Skip wrote:

Zero wrote:

Jimmy Darmody wrote:

I don't know what you mean. Half your posts are agreeing with what people say here.

For the most part I keep my mouth shut when I disagree with the general consensus here.

Ah well that's no fun, it always makes things more interesting when there are multiple points of view.

Normally, yes, but usually it turns into "Your taste sucks, you should feel bad for liking/disliking ____" or something similar. It's not that I care if people insult me or not, I'm just one to try to avoid conflict if at all possible.

Even though you agree with people in most of your posts i still think your taste sucks, so thats hardly solving the problem.

Seriously though its uncommon anyone actually says:
"Your taste sucks, you should feel bad for liking/disliking ____" or something similar.

Normally with games people are 50/50

Superbuu3 wrote:

Zero wrote:

Skip wrote:

Zero wrote:

Jimmy Darmody wrote:

I don't know what you mean. Half your posts are agreeing with what people say here.

For the most part I keep my mouth shut when I disagree with the general consensus here.

Ah well that's no fun, it always makes things more interesting when there are multiple points of view.

Normally, yes, but usually it turns into "Your taste sucks, you should feel bad for liking/disliking ____" or something similar. It's not that I care if people insult me or not, I'm just one to try to avoid conflict if at all possible.

Even though you agree with people in most of your posts i still think your taste sucks, so thats hardly solving the problem.

Seriously though its uncommon anyone actually says:
"Your taste sucks, you should feel bad for liking/disliking ____" or something similar.

Normally with games people are 50/50

I don't just agree with people most of my posts. Again, that's a terrible exaggeration. And no, it's not uncommon. Not here it isn't.

Even if someone says that you can just say it right back to them. No one here cares.

A_Nonny_Moose wrote:

Even if someone says that you can just say it right back to them. No one here cares.

True enough...but we're way off topic.

Zero wrote:

I don't just agree with people most of my posts. Again, that's a terrible exaggeration. And no, it's not uncommon. Not here it isn't.

Its a bad an exageration as your everyone here will tell you that you should feel bad about your opinion.

The only time i ever remember that happening is Neo and Psycho over Dead island. Even then i don't think that was actually said. That sounds like one of those memes you guys go on about.

Superbuu3 wrote:

The only time i ever remember that happening is Neo and Psycho over Dead island

Huh?

People here tell me I have horrible opinions all the time. But I don't mind because I know they're wrong.

Also, playing as Catwoman is not actually part of the story. She has her own missions and they are DLC. New copies of the game come with a code to get the DLC for free.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-10-13-batman-online-pass-unlocks-catwoman

Seriously, what the hell is Rocksteady doing? Christ. They've literally stripped out everything that would be considered bonus content. It's fucking mental. Especially since when they announced "Hey, you can play as Catwoman!" a while back, they said nothing about it being DLC.

That's how I felt about Shuma-Gorath and Jill in Marvel 3. You can't just go around advertising content of your game to turn around later and single out features as being DLC exclusive. Well, you can, but you're a d-bag for doing it. Little shit here and there eventually adds up into big shit.

Is there even any game left to play.

That's not at all what he meant.

Honestly, what in the fuck is up with all of this? Didn't Rocksteady say that her missions would be part of the main story? This is fucking ridiculous.

Jimmy Darmody wrote:

That's not at all what he meant.

Whoa, really?

A_Nonny_Moose wrote:

Also, playing as Catwoman is not actually part of the story. She has her own missions and they are DLC. New copies of the game come with a code to get the DLC for free.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-10-13-batman-online-pass-unlocks-catwoman

Seriously, what the hell is Rocksteady doing? Christ. They've literally stripped out everything that would be considered bonus content. It's fucking mental. Especially since when they announced "Hey, you can play as Catwoman!" a while back, they said nothing about it being DLC.

Wtf? That's like the old cartoons where they strap a long stick to a dog's back with a T bone steak at the end.

Eh, I'm still going to buy the game used. Might just acquire all the DLC, no way in hell am I supporting this sort of business model.

I'll get it at some point, but definitely not until next year sometime when it's cheap.

Apparently Catwoman is still playable without the pass, but the pass gives 4 extra missions for her and lets you use her in the challenge rooms. Apparently. Reports from reviews seem confused on the matter.

Maybe the theoretical GOTY version will have the DLC on it already.

A_Nonny_Moose wrote:

People here tell me I have horrible opinions all the time. But I don't mind because I know they're wrong.

Looking at your recent game purchases including:
El shaddai, Bloodrayne I can see why.

I enjoyed El Shaddai. It's one of the few games I've bought this year that I played straight through without playing anything else. Nowadays I usually play 2or 3 games at a time, which I never used to do.

Superbuu3 wrote:

A_Nonny_Moose wrote:

People here tell me I have horrible opinions all the time. But I don't mind because I know they're wrong.

Looking at your recent game purchases including:
El shaddai, Bloodrayne I can see why.

Screw your opinions, El Shaddai is one of this year's most important games, in that it's (I think) the first time an AAA title has had an art director as lead designer, in that it has new and original inspirations, in that it has Lucifel with tight pants talking to God on his cell phone, and because it's not trying to copy anything else.

El Shaddai was hardly a AAA game.

Was it short moose?

Kaede wrote:

Superbuu3 wrote:

A_Nonny_Moose wrote:

People here tell me I have horrible opinions all the time. But I don't mind because I know they're wrong.

Looking at your recent game purchases including:
El shaddai, Bloodrayne I can see why.

Screw your opinions, El Shaddai is one of this year's most important games, in that it's (I think) the first time an AAA title has had an art director as lead designer, in that it has new and original inspirations, in that it has Lucifel with tight pants talking to God on his cell phone, and because it's not trying to copy anything else.

Feisty . Thats the first time i've thought you actually gave a crap about something in forever.

I did think the art direction of the game was amazing, but what little gameplay i played it did not feel worthy of being a full retail game. The simplistic and unique visuals are what made it a visual treat. But lets not forget video games are allowed to both look great and play great. Also is this really triple A?

Shank series to me is way more epic its done by artists and has some of the best combat gameplay this gen i can't wait to see what 2 delivers.