| I'll probably start emerald | |
|
+7Haseoviawesome Kaio Talking Sock Kimarous Skip brandon Superbuu3 11 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Superbuu3 Raziel
Posts : 41040 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 2023 Location : Nosgoth
| Subject: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:24 am | |
| well unless i play another game (suggestions are welcome) i might trade in all 3 starter pokemon i've yet to decide if you wanna be anything just put names in here, i will be doing a full run + complete game bonus areas Caught
BD - Torchic Sora - Charmander Skip - Treecko Haseo - Mudkip Xalas - Aron Kimarous - Sableeye
Shotgunned Sarbud - Spheal Chou - Trapinch. (He can be found in route 111.) Kaio - Squirtle Bob - Cyndaquil Tobi - Jirachi
- Spoiler:
- Chuck Bass wrote:
- Trapinch -> Vibrava -> Flygon (Level 45 I think)
-Ground/Dragon type -Immune to ground/electric attacks -Item: Leftovers -Movelist: 1) Earthquake (TM) 2) Screech 3)-4) Crunch/Dragon Breath/Hyper Beam/Fire Blast (TM)/Giga Drain (TM) - xalas wrote:
- hmmm i want to be an aron plz
Aron ---> at 32 Lairon ---> at 42 Aggron steel/rock abillitys are sturdy OR rockhead item to be held: metal coat irontail learned at lvl 48 or from TM 23 earthquake from TM 26 surf from HM03 and double team from TM 32 - Skip wrote:
- Sceptile is semi badass
Anyway, you want to teach it leaf blade (level 26) and dragon claw (tm)
Last edited by Superbuu3 on Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:34 am; edited 8 times in total | |
|
| |
brandon Basement Butterfly
Posts : 15472 Joined : 2008-08-04 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:42 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Skip Australianus
Posts : 10290 Joined : 2009-07-02 Age : 32 Location : Just Under Down Under
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:42 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Kimarous CP9 Agent
Posts : 6399 Joined : 2008-08-03 Age : 35 Location : Canada
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:56 am | |
| Sableye! Might not be the strongest Pokemon out there, but Sableye's awesome, dammit! Friggin' half-Ghost, half-Dark! No critical weaknesses! | |
|
| |
Talking Sock Big Daddy Boss
Posts : 9250 Joined : 2008-08-11 Age : 32 Location : Down Under
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:59 am | |
| Do you liek mudkipz? I wanna be a Mudkip. | |
|
| |
Kimarous CP9 Agent
Posts : 6399 Joined : 2008-08-03 Age : 35 Location : Canada
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:00 am | |
| - Sora wrote:
- Do you liek mudkipz? I wanna be a Mudkip.
A creature that blends land and water and is named after the sky... THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE! | |
|
| |
brandon Basement Butterfly
Posts : 15472 Joined : 2008-08-04 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:01 am | |
| or if no torchic, slakoth, dun care whether you keep me as vigoroth or make me saking either | |
|
| |
Superbuu3 Raziel
Posts : 41040 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 2023 Location : Nosgoth
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:12 am | |
| uh if i find these things playing this i now know the first 100 or so these sound quite far down the line >_> | |
|
| |
Talking Sock Big Daddy Boss
Posts : 9250 Joined : 2008-08-11 Age : 32 Location : Down Under
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:16 am | |
| - Kimarous wrote:
- Sora wrote:
- Do you liek mudkipz? I wanna be a Mudkip.
A creature that blends land and water and is named after the sky...
THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE! The KH pokemon! | |
|
| |
Kimarous CP9 Agent
Posts : 6399 Joined : 2008-08-03 Age : 35 Location : Canada
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:18 am | |
| Sableye should be found in the caves not too far from the second gym, IIRC... | |
|
| |
Superbuu3 Raziel
Posts : 41040 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 2023 Location : Nosgoth
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:37 am | |
| - Kimarous wrote:
- Sableye should be found in the caves not too far from the second gym, IIRC...
Thanks i'm hoping its good you were awesome on my last run | |
|
| |
Skip Australianus
Posts : 10290 Joined : 2009-07-02 Age : 32 Location : Just Under Down Under
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:49 am | |
| Well, it's good in that it can take hits well. Not too sure about how strong it is though. Once it gets Shadow ball it should be good though. Torchik and Treecko are starters btw. | |
|
| |
brandon Basement Butterfly
Posts : 15472 Joined : 2008-08-04 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:59 am | |
| slaking is a tank but only attacks once every two turns.....
if you don't want that i'll be an aron, seedot, makuhita, zangoose or a bagon.
R/S/E has some of my favorite pokemon
EDIT: if you don't choose torchic, slakoth and seedot can be caught before the first gym i think. makuhita and aron right before the second gym
whatever you want to use to keep your team balanced i'm fine with any of those | |
|
| |
Superbuu3 Raziel
Posts : 41040 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 2023 Location : Nosgoth
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:11 am | |
| - Skip wrote:
- Well, it's good in that it can take hits well. Not too sure about how strong it is though. Once it gets Shadow ball it should be good though. Torchik and Treecko are starters btw.
oh thats no problem i'll just spawn them in the wild so i can catch one | |
|
| |
Skip Australianus
Posts : 10290 Joined : 2009-07-02 Age : 32 Location : Just Under Down Under
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:14 am | |
| Treecko is the best starter. You should evolve it before level 26 though. | |
|
| |
Superbuu3 Raziel
Posts : 41040 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 2023 Location : Nosgoth
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:15 am | |
| | |
|
| |
brandon Basement Butterfly
Posts : 15472 Joined : 2008-08-04 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:18 am | |
| only starter that doesn't have double weakness????????? maybe??? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:21 am | |
| As I said in the other topic, I know nothing of the new Pokemon. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:24 am | |
| Looking through Bulbapedia, I'll take Tobi's idea and be: Spheal. goo goo g'joob. |
|
| |
Skip Australianus
Posts : 10290 Joined : 2009-07-02 Age : 32 Location : Just Under Down Under
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:30 am | |
| Well, its second and third forms learn different attacks than the first form. One of those attacks is the best grass attack in the game (weaker than solar beam, but no chargge up time.) As for being the best, I guess it's down to opinion, but Swampert has a double weakness, and Blaziken has tons of weaknesses. | |
|
| |
Superbuu3 Raziel
Posts : 41040 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 2023 Location : Nosgoth
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:37 am | |
| uh i get it apparent;y i need to look at each pokemon before i evolve them | |
|
| |
Superbuu3 Raziel
Posts : 41040 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 2023 Location : Nosgoth
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:44 am | |
| sweet got both now
if anyone wants to be the third starter let me know | |
|
| |
Talking Sock Big Daddy Boss
Posts : 9250 Joined : 2008-08-11 Age : 32 Location : Down Under
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:54 am | |
| - Superbuu3 wrote:
- sweet got both now
if anyone wants to be the third starter let me know - Sora wrote:
- Do you liek mudkipz? I wanna be a Mudkip.
| |
|
| |
Kaio Internet Celebrity
Posts : 13827 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:20 am | |
| I want to be something strong. | |
|
| |
Superbuu3 Raziel
Posts : 41040 Joined : 2008-07-31 Age : 2023 Location : Nosgoth
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:28 am | |
| i have no idea whats strong
i thought i was playing one similar to sarbud those looked vaguely familiar these ones are all cute o_O | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: I'll probably start emerald | |
| |
|
| |
| I'll probably start emerald | |
|