I bought Prince of Persia

I also had Fallout 3 and Naruto: UNS in my hands, but I'm not a fan of Oblivion and I didn't like the mechanics of UNS much (granted, I only played for like 3 minutes, so I didn't really give it a fair shot). But I always liked PoP so I went with that.

What didn't you like about Oblivion? Maybe the differences in Fallout 3 will rectify it.

I still think Oblivion > Fallout 3. There's more to see, more to do, and the world just feels better. There's only so many feet of apocalyptic wasteland you can cope with.

Not to mention F3's story was ridiculous.

I didn't like Oblivion because of its huge world and the enormous free-roaming stuff that goes with it. I never really like those games (save for GTA), so it's not a thing that only pertains to Oblivion.

SimianWonder wrote:

I still think Oblivion > Fallout 3. There's more to see, more to do, and the world just feels better. There's only so many feet of apocalyptic wasteland you can cope with.

Not to mention F3's story was ridiculous.

True dat.

https://razielsdomain.forumotion.net/game-reviews-f13/fallout-3-plot-analysis-by-officer-cooper-of-gamefaqs-t6748.htm

I'd forgotten about that topic. Very amusing.

Mr. Robot wrote:

I didn't like Oblivion because of its huge world and the enormous free-roaming stuff that goes with it. I never really like those games (save for GTA), so it's not a thing that only pertains to Oblivion.

You found it a little overwhelming? I love those sort of games, there's always something new to discover.

I'm sick of RPG's set in "Ye Olde Times" so I never tried Oblivion. And I'm not interested in Fallout 3, not in the slightest.

But Prince of Persia is good.

Oblivion isn't 'ye olde times', it's just a very well realised fantasy world. PoP doesn't appeal to me to be honest.

GOBLINS AND ORCS = FAIL IN MY BOOK

This light seed hunting is utterly boring. I hope I don't have to this for the entire game. >_>

Collecting things is the butter of platforming, spread over the bread of platforming, which is platforming.

You have to do it for the whole game. A pain in the ass, but the one-on-one fights are fun as hell.

It was not fun as hell. Apart from the fights with the Warrior, all the fights were the same. The seeds actually give you a reason to explore the environments as much as you can, which admittedly isn't much. The game would have been more boring without them.

Goddamn. I already know I will get stuck at one point because I didn't completely search everywhere for those seeds.

i'm sure the game won't leave you completely stuck

Mr. Robot wrote:

Goddamn. I already know I will get stuck at one point because I didn't completely search everywhere for those seeds.

You don't need to get all of them, only about 3/4.

thats fairly retarded if you just can't progress if you don't have said shards

It's unlikely the come to that. The individual areas are fairly small and the seeds are littered everywhere.

Yet it is possible, the fact it is is stupid

Why?

cause prince of persia games are one way to have to back track would be boring/pointless/impossible

games shouldn't stop a person dead in there tracks and ultimately say you fail

A_Nonny_Moose wrote:

Mr. Robot wrote:

Goddamn. I already know I will get stuck at one point because I didn't completely search everywhere for those seeds.

You don't need to get all of them, only about 3/4.

540 out of 1001, so closer to half.

[quote="A_Nonny_Moose"]It was not fun as hell. /quote]

Maybe not for you.

DevilKingBaal wrote:

A_Nonny_Moose wrote:

It was not fun as hell.

Maybe not for you.

i thought it was annoying for some parts, but it was so darn pretty i didnt care.


...wow that sounds shallow