Metal Gear Solid: Ground Zeroes

That's real time.

The FOX engine looks amazing. Looks like Kojima's gonna lead the way for the next gen technologically just like he did with MGS2 for PS2. Also there's gonna be a movie at some point.

http://kotaku.com/5939164/konami-reveals-metal-gear-solid-ground-zeroes-it-looks-fxxking-hot

an open world MGS?

I will never not be excited for a new Metal Gear game.

totally forgot today was the day of this Metal Gear event..

anyways, looks great, can't wait for a trailer.

Quote :

The demo was running on a PC at current-gen specs, and its wow-factor seemed to impress those in attendance. It's also been designed with the Xbox 360 and PS3 in mind.

Superbuu3 wrote:

Quote :

The demo was running on a PC at current-gen specs, and its wow-factor seemed to impress those in attendance. It's also been designed with the Xbox 360 and PS3 in mind.

I can't believe that, this has got to be a next-gen console launch title or something that they're not allowed to talk about yet.

Inigo Montoya wrote:

Superbuu3 wrote:

Quote :

The demo was running on a PC at current-gen specs, and its wow-factor seemed to impress those in attendance. It's also been designed with the Xbox 360 and PS3 in mind.

I can't believe that, this has got to be a next-gen console launch title or something that they're not allowed to talk about yet.

Its quite clear that PCs are just falling behind as usual.

Obviously.

Um. Wow.

I'm throwing my money at the computer and nothing's happening, WHY?

i'm excited for it already

nice.

Inigo Montoya wrote:

Superbuu3 wrote:

Quote :

The demo was running on a PC at current-gen specs, and its wow-factor seemed to impress those in attendance. It's also been designed with the Xbox 360 and PS3 in mind.

I can't believe that, this has got to be a next-gen console launch title or something that they're not allowed to talk about yet.

Lol, neo and his PC elitism:
http://blog.us.playstation.com/2012/09/01/pax-2012-metal-gear-solid-ground-zeroes-is-coming-to-ps3/

You understand that this is far worse news for console gamers than it is for people who play on PC?

Inigo Montoya wrote:

You understand that this is far worse news for console gamers than it is for people who play on PC?

If there are no missing features why would i care, I'm a huge MGS fan.

Because one way or another the game will have to be gimped to run on 8 year old hardware. Whether this is through less complex AI, number of concurrent events onscreen, less complex systems or something arguably less important like visuals the game, while almost guaranteed to be good, will not be what it could have been were it designed with next-gen consoles and PCs in mind. PC as a platform will always evolve and have games made for it, this just holds consoles back.

Inigo Montoya wrote:

Because one way or another the game will have to be gimped to run on 8 year old hardware. Whether this is through less complex AI, number of concurrent events onscreen, less complex systems or something arguably less important like visuals the game, while almost guaranteed to be good, will not be what it could have been were it designed with next-gen consoles and PCs in mind. PC as a platform will always evolve and have games made for it, this just holds consoles back.

Never had a problem with AI in any of the MGS games, can't imagine that would be a problem now.

Number of concurrent events on screen I can see as being a potential problem, but i guess we'll see when it comes out. Never really felt that was an issue in the MGS series, considering how much 4 had going on in it, when you ran across the battlefields (i think it was chapter 2).

The point isn't that the game or anything in it will be bad, because I don't think it will, it's that it could be better.

Inigo Montoya wrote:

The point isn't that the game or anything in it will be bad, because I don't think it will, it's that it could be better.

Also could take much longer to release.

Considering that half the industry seems focused on churning out crap as quickly as possible I don't really think that's a problem. Also as long as the time is spent making the game better than it would otherwise be who really cares? It's not like Anarchy Reigns which was literally delayed for no reason.

I don't know why anyone's acting like Kojima's game have ever sacrificed gameplay and content for great graphics. It might be one thing if it's another company, but it's not like Hideo Kojima's ever had a problem with releasing his games a good few years apart on major consoles.

EDIT:

The Life and Times of Big Boss

Spoiler:

apparently, this is not MGS5 but a prologue to it:

http://www.joystiq.com/2012/09/01/metal-gear-solid-ground-zeroes-is-gorgeous-open-world-and-not/


so is he making 2 games then? cause he did confirm making MGS5, but now he says this ain't it. maybe MGS5 is Project Ogre then?

He confirmed that Project Ogre is completely unrelated to Metal Gear and that he's annoyed with people thinking otherwise.

Baal wrote:

I don't know why anyone's acting like Kojima's game have ever sacrificed gameplay and content for great graphics

Nobody is. I also said that visuals are the least important advantage that next generation consoles and PC have over PS3 and 360.