Saw 5

damn these films went downhill
the idea of sitting through number 5 just because of how bad it probably is so bad
is scarier then this movie could ever hope to be

Superbuu3 wrote:

damn these films went downhill
the idea of sitting through number 5 just because of how bad it probably is so bad
is scarier then this movie could ever hope to be

I wanted to see Saw 5, though. Especially ever since seeing how good Saw IV was, and I have yet to see the earlier ones, though.

oh right
i refused to wath 4 after the abysmal 3
one was amazing 2 was nothing special

seriously the likelihood of living up to the epicness of the first movie is unlikely

Superbuu3 wrote:

oh right
i refused to wath 4 after the abysmal 3
one was amazing 2 was nothing special

seriously the likelihood of living up to the epicness of the first movie is unlikely

I won't spoil too much, but it does explain Jigsaw's origins.

Only seen the first two, and the second wasn't that good. At least after Saw 6 there shouldn't be any more.

Homer Satan wrote:

Only seen the first two, and the second wasn't that good. At least after Saw 6 there shouldn't be any more.

i seriously hope your right
i hate how they flog a dead horse

they killed one of the most innovative horror films in a while

Superbuu3 wrote:

Snake wrote:

Superbuu3 wrote:

oh right
i refused to wath 4 after the abysmal 3
one was amazing 2 was nothing special

seriously the likelihood of living up to the epicness of the first movie is unlikely

I won't spoil too much, but it does explain Jigsaw's origins.

Spoiler:

I'll go ahead and say one thing in a following spoiler filter...

Spoiler:

Superbuu3 wrote:

Homer Satan wrote:

Only seen the first two, and the second wasn't that good. At least after Saw 6 there shouldn't be any more.

i seriously hope your right
i hate how they flog a dead horse

they killed one of the most innovative horror films in a while

Well it seems like it was planned to a 6 part series from the start, providing the films kpt making enough money to justify a sequel.

oh right
if you'd seen saw and then told me 4 was good i may be convinced to watxh it
but as you enetered the series half way you may not have seen how much its standards have dropped

I liked Saw and Saw 2, but 3 was awful, it was simply nasty for the sake of being nasty. For that reason, I didn't see IV, and won't see V either.

SimianWonder wrote:

I liked Saw and Saw 2, but 3 was awful, it was simply nasty for the sake of being nasty. For that reason, I didn't see IV, and won't see V either.

that was exactly what i thought
i didn't actually find 3 as gruesome as 2 though
number one and two made me cringe a lot more

though people collapsed watching 3
my theory was the franchise
was big enough to attract non horror fiilm goers
and they couldn't handle it

I thought that Saw and Saw 2, whilst violent, at least had some justification for being that way. 3 just seemed like it was struggling to find reasons to be nasty, and it left a nasty taste in the mouth.

Superbuu3 wrote:

oh right
if you'd seen saw and then told me 4 was good i may be convinced to watxh it
but as you enetered the series half way you may not have seen how much its standards have dropped

Heh, just like how I once heard that the commentaries in Smackdown vs. RAW 2008 are almost identical to SvR 2007. But since 2008 was the first I played, I didn't mind.

Even as early as 2 it just seemed like the main focus of the film was shifting to watching people die in various ways. And the orchestration of the plot just got way too big. The first Saw felt pretty simple, and it was better for it.

SimianWonder wrote:

I thought that Saw and Saw 2, whilst violent, at least had some justification for being that way. 3 just seemed like it was struggling to find reasons to be nasty, and it left a nasty taste in the mouth.

the protagonist was an idiot to that didn't help matters
i actually wanted him to die
and was disappointed everytime he evaded death

Saw I was the only good one. 2 was mediocre and 3 was shit. Haven't seen IV or V.