Captain America: The First Avenger

Personally I'd put it at Iron Man > Thor >/= Cap > Iron Man 2. I haven't seen the 'new' Hulk yet, so I guess that'll be the next movie I watch.

This was a bit disappointing. After the scene with Blonsky dodging around shooting at Hulk I was expecting a bit more from the action scenes beyond Cap just punching people really hard. It didn't do a good job of selling his superhuman abillities.

Different directors with different ideas as to what the Super Soldier should be capable of.

The Hulk version was better. Although Cap having a team of regular men around who also kicked ass didn't do much to make him stand out. It's not like they even put much emphasis on him being a great leader or tactition or anything. He was just a strong guy who punched his way to victory.

I'll admit I enjoyed the hell out of Cap, but yeah, they didn't really demonstrate his full repertoire. He did manage to get the others to follow him which would suggest a certain amount of charisma, and he did infiltrate the initial Hydra base on his own, but it did come across as a bit of blind luck rather than following any great plan.

Oh, him sneaking into the base just made Hydra look really incompetent. He barely did anything in the film and I don't think a number of the other characters could have also done.

Really though Cap is only at Peak Human abilities. He's borderline super but he's not actually in the super range.

Well he did chase down that car after he got the serum. Made a lot of impossible jumps like jumping ontop of what looked like a 30 foot tall tank and then jumping off of it after it exploded. What bugged me was the shield throws. It never looked like it ever came back to him, its like he just caught it. I know they wanted realism but still that's caps shield its special that way...

The shield is not special, that's partly the point. It's a round shield that he just happens to be impossibly good at using as a projectile weapon, hence why he can bounce it off walls and have it come back to him and make it look like nothing.

Well, I'm fully caught and ready for The Avengers now at least. The first two movies, Iron Man and Hulk, are my favourite ones so far. Iron Man 2 aside, they've been getting slightly worse with each release. But that might be because Iron Man and Hulk hold up on their own while the others are more about building towards the crossover.

The cube, and Red Skull's demise, are especially guilty of that.

Hulk was completely awful.

They're all average. 'Cept for IM2 which was forgettable.

Kaio wrote:

Hulk was completely awful.

What?
I'll start a petition to have Jubilee one of the main cast in the next X-Men movie, I want you to be the first to sign

I don't think you know what forgettable means.

I said all the Marvel studios movies, not IM2 alone

Damn it, I lost that good point I liked

You didn't say that. For some retarded ass reason, you thought I preferred IM2 over the other films. Then you edited your post to remove that little fuck up.

SOK wrote:

You didn't say that. For some retarded ass reason, you thought I preferred IM2 over the other films. Then you edited your post to remove that little fuck up.

Did you see the picture of SM3? I asked about that movie? And it made your reply confusing

I'll now have to soak in my sorrow

You're a terrible liar.

The hell?
I posted this picture

http://thecia.com.au//reviews/s/images/spider-man-3-poster-0.jpg

And asked if you like it more than ANY of the prequels to the Avengers movie....
And said you disappoint me if you do

Don't make me hungry

You never posted that picture and you never brought up Spidey 3. You were clearly asking if I liked IM2 more than the other Marvel films despite the fact I said it was forgettable.

Now you're trying to cover up your little mistake by bringing up this nonsense about Spidey 3. You forgot one little problem, though. In that post you changed, instead of doing something smarter like editing the Spider-Man picture in, you removed your entire response to me. Now that just looks suspicious. And it's too late to go back and fix it now, because then everyone will know you edited it again.

You've failed to veil your little faux pas, son. I win the game.

SOK wrote:

You never posted that picture and you never brought up Spidey 3.

The fuck? That's exactly what I did

Quote :

You were clearly asking if I liked IM2 more than the other Marvel films despite the fact I said it was forgettable.

My ass

Quote :

Now you're trying to cover up your little mistake by bringing up this nonsense about Spidey 3.

It happened

Quote :

You forgot one little problem, though. In that post you changed, instead of doing something smarter like editing the Spider-Man picture in, you removed your entire response to me.

You drove me bananas

Quote :

Now that just looks suspecious. And it's too late to go back and fix it now, because then everyone will know you edited it again.

You misread that, and I didn't mention IM2

Quote :

You've failed to veil your little faux pas, son. I win the game.

It would fail even if I let if you gave it the same look

Dr. Faust wrote:

It would fail even if I let if you gave it the same look

Oh, my God. i think I broke Faust.

Of course you did

SOK wrote:

Oh, my God. i think I broke Faust.

Don't worry bro, there wasn't a lot to him in the first place.

Aye.